I've CC'd Jisi who can confirm this, but I believe we actually went in a different direction and did not implement the type server idea. In practice we use the type_url field as an identifier but there is no actual server returning Type objects.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:52 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > The documentation for google.protobuf.Any says that an HTTP GET on the URL > should return a Type object in binary. However, I can't find any > documentation on how create a Type object from a protobuf definition file. > Given a compiled Message, how can I get a Type? > > Thanks, > Pradeep > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
