Actually I'm surprised that the first snippet even works. But the recommended style guide <https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/style> suggests using CamelCase for message names and snake_case for field names, so if you go with that convention then you won't have to worry about this kind of error anyway.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Lets say I have the following messages: > > message A { > int foo = 1; > } > > message B { > int bar = 1; > } > > message C { > oneof asdf { > A A = 1; > B B = 2; > } > } > > If A and B are embedded inside C like: > > message C { > message A { > int foo = 1; > } > > message B { > int bar = 1; > } > > oneof asdf { > A A = 1; > B B = 2; > } > } > > Then it errors out with: > > "A" is already defined in "pkg.C". > "B" is already defined in "pkg.C". > "A" is not defined. > "B" is not defined. > > However if I change the field name to be anything but the same as the > message name it works fine. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
