Hi,

What did you settle at?
I've googled and 
found: 
http://www.idpf.org/epub/30/spec/epub30-ocf.html#sec-container-metainf-signatures.xml
Am I correct you're using XML?

Cheers,

Paweł

On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 10:53:32 PM UTC+2, Brandon Philips wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> The Open Container Initiative is investigating use of protobuf for use for 
> filesystem and container metadata. Part of the goal is to make this 
> metadata signable. However, we learned that protobuf binary serialization 
> are not deterministic between implementations: 
> https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/xo4SQ92aWJ8/ad1-xm9qCAAJ
>
> Is there any hope of that being tackled in protobuf3 or there being at 
> least a mode to say "I really want the deterministic serialization"?
>
> It isn't a huge blocker for us but it does mean the same spec serialized 
> in a python tool and java tool MAY be different which is a bit annoying.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brandon
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to