We do have a implementation working for node: https://github.com/google/protobuf/tree/master/js However, this implementation is assumed to work with closure compiler <https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/>. Without the closure compiler, our implementation is expected to be 6~7X slower than protobufjs. (Especially for string)
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:13 PM Shailesh Kulkarni <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have following requirement. > > 1. Server is in the CPP Created from Google Protobuf def. > 2. Client Application is in Node JS. > 3. Server and client applications communicate over websocket. > > For Client application we are using > https://www.npmjs.com/package/protobufjs > > For some simple messages, the encoded messages in Node JS ProtobufJS are > same as that one generated from Cpp server (Protobuf). > > However I can see that for the nested messages there is a problem. > > Do we have node JS support for the Google Protobuf with interoperability > with other languages such as c++,Java,Python supported as client libraries > of Google Protobuf? > If yes then please share the details. If no then please confirm and let me > know. > > > Regards, > Shailesh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
