On Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 1:07:14 AM UTC-7, Girija Byraiah wrote: > > The project i am working on is interfacing 3 different instruments. Each > Instrument has Instrument specific configurations, analysis specific > configurations ,and Target Specific configuration. I am sure i dont need > any RDBMS database like oracle or mysql but my team wants to use sqllite. > After reading about google protcol buffers I feel protobufs give versioning > ability for data which is really good, but are there any opensource code > that helps querying , indexing and picking up capability , My project is in > c# and .net framework. >
my question is should we move to sqllite or just use .proto files and define the configurations in binary files and read back the data into binary files and just use them to generate reports instead of any databases like sqllite, now my question is can we do a query or indexing using proto buffers? there are not more than 10 max control parameters that are read back as experiment results , its mainly fluorescence and temperature readings that we get back from instrument every minute for 90 minutes.I am new to protobuf and want to understand the restrictions and limitations of protobuf for such application vs sqllite? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
