On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 4:28 PM Michael Powell <mwpowell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there some documentation concerning import semantics? > > For starters, I assume that you specify the path. This may be further > enhanced by specification of an "import path", not unlike in C++ > wherein you may specify include, library, etc, paths.
I have not received any clarification for this. Can someone please clarify? I want to think in terms of C++ access modifiers, private, protected, public, etc, but I'm not positive this is analogous, or what the ramifications ought to be when "linking" across .proto files. http://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto2-spec#import_statement > Second, what is the impact of "weak"? "public"? Or an unspecified modifier? > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > > Michael Powell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
