Thanks! On Saturday, 19 January 2019 03:34:42 UTC+3, Adam Cozzette wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. The schemas do not even have to be exactly the same, and > in fact protobuf is designed to allow the schema to evolve in a compatible > way. The most important thing is just to never reuse the same field number > with incompatible types. > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:30 AM Nikita Vorobyev <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> Is protobuf compiler-neutral? Will I be able to deserialize message with >> code, generated by compiler of version X, if this message was serialized >> with compiler of version Y? Version of syntax and schemes will be obviously >> the same on both sides. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Nikita. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Protocol Buffers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
