I understand the cost of switching to a new framework is high, but the benefit of this is also huge. Companies like Google or Facebook that provide latency-sensitive services gain a lot by doing this. Is there a more fundamental reason discouraging them to switch?
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 5:09:26 PM UTC+1, Arash Pourhabibi-Zarandi wrote: > > Hi, > > > My question is if FlatBuffers is much faster than Protobuf, why isn't it > more widely used compared to Protobuf? > > > It used to be an experimental thing but it seems to be mature enough now > but isn't widely used yet. It seems people mostly use Flatbuffers for > mobile apps/games. Why is that the case? > > > Arash > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
