On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:06 PM Gregory Bourassa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Has anyone noticed that the example message which begins the document is > erroneous. At one point (under the Message Structure heading) the authors > claim that: > > 96 01 = 1001 0110 0000 0001 > > which it cannot, since 1001 0110 in radix 10 is 150.
But it's 96 in radix 16. You always use hex when talking about file / bit encodings, never base 10... Cheers, -ilia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/CAKb7UvgnrFCCxB7fyUsAT3T7e0ShJoK5ggsjm82Y4koRm1yV5A%40mail.gmail.com.
