I've just drawn a railroad diagram for the specification and noticed a few issues. https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto3-spec
A) Should <<enumBody>> permit <<reserved>> ? B) Should <<fieldNumber = intLit;>> omit the trailing semicolon, to be consistent with this variety of EBNF ? C Should syntax for <<comment>> be defined, along with an explanation of whether comments can appear between terminal symbols ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/25258bf8-94a5-45fc-afeb-f1e038d938a3n%40googlegroups.com.
