if you place this enum definition within a message scope you could avoid these conflicts.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 5:13 AM Daniel Fernandes < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello guys, > > I'm generating some enums from proto files to be used in a flutter/dart > application using the default "protoc-gen-dart" plugin. A Sample proto > definition looks like this: > > syntax = "proto3"; > enum TransactionType { > TransactionTypeNotSet = 0; > TransactionTypeFirstType = 1; > TransactionTypeSecondType= 2; > TransactionTypeThirdType = 3; > } > > And the generated code from the plugin looks like this: > class TransactionType extends $pb.ProtobufEnum { > static const TransactionType TransactionTypeNotSet = TransactionType > ._(0, const $core.bool.fromEnvironment('protobuf.omit_enum_names') ? '' : > 'TransactionTypeNotSet'); > static const TransactionType TransactionTypeFirstType = > TransactionType._(0, const $core.bool.fromEnvironment( > 'protobuf.omit_enum_names') ? '' : 'TransactionTypeFirstType'); > static const TransactionType TransactionTypeSecondType = > TransactionType._(0, const $core.bool.fromEnvironment( > 'protobuf.omit_enum_names') ? '' : 'TransactionTypeSecondType'); > static const TransactionType TransactionTypeThirdType = > TransactionType._(0, const $core.bool.fromEnvironment( > 'protobuf.omit_enum_names') ? '' : 'TransactionTypeThirdType'); > } > > So currently I have to specify the enums like this, "TransactionType. > TransactionTypeFirstType", > which adds some unwanted redundancy, when I could just have it like this, " > TransactionType.FirstType". So what I would like is to have some kind of > class name prefix removal from the generated enums, which would also be > useful for other languages which follow a class-based enum approach. Is > this possible? > > Some final remarks: The reason why I just don't specify the enums as > "FirstType", "SecondType" instead of "TransactionTypeFirstType" in the > protos is due to the fact that i have some others enum types whose values > share the same naming (ex: FirstType), which would have re-declaration > problems. > > Thanks and Regards. > Daniel Fernandes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/7af5114f-25b7-4e21-a917-83aeb5c66e34n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/7af5114f-25b7-4e21-a917-83aeb5c66e34n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/CAA9YwXp%2BUXRD4L5kDdRRwu5DZfLCBdNL6tMiNdFLqY%2BseK_ojg%40mail.gmail.com.
