Does protobuf really need to be extended to accommodate this? This seems potentially/reasonably straightforwardly handled via annotations (as I currently understand your needs).
Separately, i think I recall seeing something in a golang package sometimein the last ~year (which had also existed in java). I'd have to look up the specifics (currently on my phone). @mike - dm me at [email protected] if you want to schedule a time to discuss this in the next week or so. On Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 12:27 PM 'Mike Vacirca' via Protocol Buffers < [email protected]> wrote: > Pinging again on this item - is this the right forum to ask this type of > question? > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:20 AM Mike Vacirca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was curious if there was ever discussion on extending Protocol Buffers >> to include coverage for redaction of a data field? >> >> Specifically, we are looking at the use case of a developer having a >> keyword available to them that would allow data classification services, >> logging services, et. al. to be able to read a particular data field as >> requiring redaction due to core customer content (or other data >> classification state) and filtering out the contents during >> archival/transmission/etc. >> >> Or if this would be the wrong approach, are there areas that may be the >> right technical approach to "shift left" the annotation of parameters >> earlier in the cycle during coding? >> >> We are looking at ways to improve the current workflow in GCP which >> requires us to track and annotate data between RPC services in production >> using manual annotation from engineers post-development. >> > > > -- > > *Michael Vacirca* > > 718-938-9424 > > Senior Engineering Manager, Regulated Cloud > > Google Cloud > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/CAPvXYq1eGgNpf2KF%3D68wO4mLMwwRHMGe-%3DzE4fq4yCzTLOkGXA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/CAPvXYq1eGgNpf2KF%3D68wO4mLMwwRHMGe-%3DzE4fq4yCzTLOkGXA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/CAEbFGqtb-2Trehcocnobfz9S3FTj9miyfvNbN4VPgbGQd-0Jkg%40mail.gmail.com.
