Hello everyone,
Intro: My company is in the process of migrating schemas from proto2 to
proto3. I am eliminating extensions as they are not supported.
Question: I am wondering if it is possible to get a field object using it's
name.
Example: In proto2, my current code looks like this:
*> Foo.proto*
message Foo {
message Bar {
unint32 a = 1;
}
extend Foo {
Bar b = 1;
}
}
*> in C++*
*Foo::Bar b_val = foo.MutableExtension(Foo::b);*
Now in proto3, I could do this:
*> Foo.proto*
syntax="proto3";
message Foo {
message Bar {
unint32 a = 1;
}
Bar b = 1;
}
*> in C++*
*Foo::Bar b_val = foo.mutable_b();*
However, I want to use the name Foo::b to get a Foo::Bar object. Is there a
way to do this? If there is, which one is recommended?
Thanks,
Mihir
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/4b958fe0-5ec9-4fd9-99a9-cf096e6ff289n%40googlegroups.com.
