On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell
<robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
> and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
> KEYS file for example.
> (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
> and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> https://people.apache.org/keys/).

Sorry I haven't looked at this stuff for a while now, so wasn't aware
about the new mechanism.
The existing KEYS file was inside the qpid tree, hence my suggestion.
Actually a better suggestion would have been to move that file to the top level.

But anyways, given that we have a new system in place it's irrelevant now.
We should make an attempt to use the new approach.


> Robbie
> On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
>> We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
>> Please look at the RAT output I posted.
>> Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
>> will have to sign the final artefacts.
>> You already have your key listed here [1]
>> We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
>> Regards,
>> Rajith
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
>> > properly. That's the only change from RC5.
>> >
>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
>> >
>> > --Rafael

Reply via email to