Rafi, We should create tags for the releases. Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though).
Regards, Rajith On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. > I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. > > --Rafael > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross <tr...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good. >> >> -Ted >> >> >> On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: >> >>> Source is here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/**qpid-proton-0.3rc3/<http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/> >>> Java binaries are here: >>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheqpid-118/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/> >>> >>> Fixes since RC2 include: >>> >>> - messenger now reports aborted connections >>> - tarball for ruby gem generation >>> - ssl fix (PROTON-171) >>> >>> --Rafael >>> >>> >>
