On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, William Henry <whe...@redhat.com> wrote:

> This seems to require more copying, right?  I'm always weary of extra
> copying.
>
> Is there a way to have a (small) pool of buffers, or just two for swapping
> between, that can be used to eliminate extra copying? Does that make sense
> in this case?
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something but as I said it sounds like extra copying
> which causes higher latency.
>

It actually eliminates a copy on both input and output relative to what we
do now because the driver can copy directly into/out of the transport-owned
buffers.

--Rafael

Reply via email to