+1 we should have a tag in the repo for each of our releases

-- Rob

On 26 February 2013 20:34, Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rafi,
>
> I don't want to sound pedantic, but we should tag our releases as per
> the guidelines provided by Apache.
> The previous releases don't have tags either (at least they do have a
> branch, but the current release doesn't have a branch either).
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> I've uploaded the artifacts and updated the download page[1]. It will be
>> about 24 hours or so until the mirrors are fully synced.
>>
>> [1] http://qpid.apache.org/proton/download.html
>>
>> --Rafael
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly.
>>>
>>> --Rafael
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble
>>>> issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote.
>>>>
>>>> Source is here:
>>>>   - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/
>>>>
>>>> Java binaries are here:
>>>>  - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/
>>>>
>>>> Changes since RC2:
>>>>
>>>> PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases
>>>> PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions
>>>> of swig
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final
>>>> [ ] No, because ...
>>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to