+1 we should have a tag in the repo for each of our releases -- Rob
On 26 February 2013 20:34, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: > Rafi, > > I don't want to sound pedantic, but we should tag our releases as per > the guidelines provided by Apache. > The previous releases don't have tags either (at least they do have a > branch, but the current release doesn't have a branch either). > > Regards, > > Rajith > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Rafael Schloming <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've uploaded the artifacts and updated the download page[1]. It will be >> about 24 hours or so until the mirrors are fully synced. >> >> [1] http://qpid.apache.org/proton/download.html >> >> --Rafael >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Rafael Schloming <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly. >>> >>> --Rafael >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble >>>> issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. >>>> >>>> Source is here: >>>> - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ >>>> >>>> Java binaries are here: >>>> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ >>>> >>>> Changes since RC2: >>>> >>>> PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases >>>> PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions >>>> of swig >>>> >>>> [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final >>>> [ ] No, because ... >>>> >>> >>>
