If I see NO-JIRA then I usually infer that the author considered whether a Jira was required and decided not. Without this marker, I can't distinguish between deliberate and accidental omission of the Jira number.
On 14 March 2013 14:47, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > To be honest, I've never really understood the point of the NO-JIRA thing. > What's the technical difference between NO-JIRA: blah and simply omitting > the PROTON-xxx? I can't see that it would significantly improve grepability > since either way you need to run a regex over the whole log string for > anything that matches PROTON-[0-9]+. > > --Rafael > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Phil Harvey <p...@philharveyonline.com > >wrote: > > > I notice a fair smattering of recent Proton commits without Jira numbers > in > > them. As far as I'm aware, all commits should either contain a Jira > number > > in the format "PROTON-xyz:" or, for exceptionally simple changes, > > "NO-JIRA:". > > > > Please shout if you disagree. > > > > Thanks > > Phil > > >