Yup, shouldn't be a problem.

--Rafael


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Phil Harvey <p...@philharveyonline.com>wrote:

> Note that I've just committed a change for PROTON-270 which means the Maven
> artifactId for the tests module is now "proton-tests" rather than just
> "tests".  Presumably you are happy to include this in 0.5.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On 6 August 2013 13:34, Ken Giusti <kgiu...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > We are planning on creating an 0.5 branch at some point, correct?
> >
> > I ask as we've branched all preceding releases - I'd expect the same for
> > 0.5.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -K
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rafael Schloming" <r...@alum.mit.edu>
> > > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 6:38:11 AM
> > > Subject: Re: 0.5 RC1
> > >
> > > The svn info for every release artifact is captured in the artifact
> > itself
> > > in the SVN_INFO file, in this case it is:
> > >
> > > Repo: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton
> > > Branch: trunk
> > > Revision: 1510659
> > >
> > > I don't anticipate anything going into trunk that won't appear in 0.5
> > > final, however if necessary we can branch. Either way, I would test the
> > > tarball as that form is what we will be releasing and it is possible
> that
> > > build/installation stuff might work fine from svn but have issues when
> > > running from the tarball.
> > >
> > > --Rafael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Bozo Dragojevic <bo...@digiverse.si>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 5. 08. 13 21:14, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> As promised, here is 0.5 RC1:
> > > >>
> > > >>    http://people.apache.org/~rhs/**qpid-proton-0.5rc1/<
> > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc1/>
> > > >>
> > > >> Java binaries are here:
> > > >>
> > > >>    https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> > > >> orgapacheqpid-064/<
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-064/>
> > > >>
> > > >> --Rafael
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > which svn revision corresponds to this? r1510511 or current
> > top-of-trunk
> > > > r1510646?
> > > >
> > > > should I be testing the tar or top-of-trunk? will trunk get fixes
> that
> > > > will *not* appear in 0.5 final?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Bozzo
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > -K
> >
>

Reply via email to