[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael H. Schloming resolved PROTON-420.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.7
Assignee: Rafael H. Schloming
I believe this has been addressed, but if there are still issues then please
reopen.
> Warnings Presented When Using Strict Compiler Flags
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-420
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-420
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: proton-c
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Environment: GCC 4.4.7
> Reporter: Frank Quinn
> Assignee: Rafael H. Schloming
> Fix For: 0.7
>
> Attachments:
> FIX-Warnings-Presented-When-Using-Strict-Compiler-Flags-PROTON-420.patch
>
>
> Hi Folks,
> In our project, we currently use the following compiler flags for gcc (tested
> in version 4.4.7):
> -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Werror
> Unfortunately this causes problems in recent versions of proton as its
> headers produce some warnings of their own. The ones we have spotted can be
> recreated using the following code:
> #include <proton/error.h>
> #include <proton/messenger.h>
> int main(){}
> Compiled with:
> $ gcc -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -I./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/ test.c -o
> test
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> In file included from test.c:1:
> ./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/proton/error.h:46: error: function
> declaration isn’t a prototype
> In file included from test.c:2:
> ./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/proton/messenger.h:458:29: error: "/*"
> within comment
> ./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/proton/messenger.h:466:40: error: "/*"
> within comment
> ./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/proton/messenger.h:470:32: error: "/*"
> within comment
> ./qpid-proton-0.5/proton-c/include/proton/messenger.h:475:34: error: "/*"
> within comment
> test.c:4: error: function declaration isn’t a prototype
> The first one can be resolved by changing pn_error() to pn_error(void) and
> the others can be fixed simply by adding some spacing. We typically just hack
> our local copies for testing, but we figured it may be better to get this
> into the main code stream if you guys can find the time to put it in.
> Cheers,
> Frank
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)