On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:16 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 14:56 -0400, Alan Conway wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 12:08 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > > As part of QPID-619 [1]. The location of the developer script config.sh > > > has changed from the source tree to the build tree. > > > > > > The runnable config.sh is now built by cmake as part of the tree > > > configuration. This allows the script to set the correct variables > > > without using fallible heuristics. > > > > > > If this trips anyone up. or you have questions, comments etc. reply here > > > (and/or on the JIRA itself). > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-619 > > > > > > > > > > A while back I added tests/run.py, a python test runner that has > > similar config data to config.sh. It will generate something like > > config.sh if you do "run.py --sh. > > What's run.py used for if it's not used by the build system?
Sorry, didn't read your email carefully enough. I'm talking about dispatch, not proton (doh!) In case you are curious: run.py is a test runner but I also use it stand-alone to run qdrouterd and the like instead of sourcing a script like config.sh. There are two ways to use run.py with an interactive shell: run.py bash # Start a shell with the right env run.py --sh > config.sh; source config.sh # Generate a unix-sh env script In principle this works on windows as well (except for the --sh thing) but I haven't tried it. There's valgrind support also, not very well tested. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/qpid/dispatch/trunk/tests/run.py.in Wow, svn.apache.org is slow today!
