On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:37:07AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Is this the approach you referenced in your other email? (Same request here
> for a pointer to the highlighted key bits of the approach.)

No, this was a third approach to the problem, since we can't directly
affect the object created by Swig via Data_Wrap_Struct. You can see the
specific changes to ruby.i here [1].

http://github.com/mcpierce/Proton/commit/1e66f39535e71dc376d69abde7b5741929d33a3d

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

Attachment: pgprYbkagDgS7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to