+1 to 3 for all
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Giusti" <kgiu...@redhat.com> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 4:02:32 PM > Subject: Re: Changing master to always use x.y.z format versions > > A big +1 to this. I've always felt semantic versioning makes good sense: > > http://semver.org/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Robbie Gemmell" <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 3:26:59 PM > > Subject: Changing master to always use x.y.z format versions > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Flavio raised the question on the 0.10 vote thread of whether we could > > change our versions to always use 3 parts, rather than change back and > > forth from 2 whenever there is a point release. I think this is a good > > idea (I'm using 3 on the JMS client for the reasons he stated), so I'd > > like to change master to be 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT] rather than just the > > 0.11-SNAPSHOT it is currently. > > > > I'll look to do that next week unless there are any objections. > > > > Robbie > > > > -- > -K >
