Am 31.01.2007 um 17:04 schrieb ampz:
> After I read Prototype API and try it some, I love it much.
> But I feel something has miss in prototype like,
> ··· Everything put in one file and cannot separate ···
> I think prototype may have feature to load other script into
> Because this will make prototype user can load only needed part.
The different parts of Prototype require each other. Also, gzipped,
Prototype is 15k. No need to split things.
> ··· Prototype is easy to use but not enough ···
> Imagine that if you can use prototype by GUI...
> I think this will make web developer not only painless, but smile.
> Not only this, it will make number of prototype users grow up much
> My opinion, this GUI may be plug-ins of other well known application
> Eclipse, NetBeans, Visual Studio .NET, Dreamweaver, ...
Go ahead implementing this, but note that Prototype is more low-level
than typical GUI components you'll deal with in those frameworks. I
find coding my hand _much_ faster than dealing with awkward IDEs.
> ··· Standard for further implement isn't specific yet ···
> But I see many not follow prototype scripting style, they code on
> their behavior. (...)
> This not effect anything, just not make sense for coder.
> Note: Standard like, how to declare type of parameter, return type,
> way to code and extend function, etc.
The prototypejs.org site will probably have more info on coding
conventions and coding "tricks", so subscribe to the RSS feed and
watch out... :)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at