> > I wasn't being very clear -- sorry. Those first two examples > > illustrate what would happen if we implemented *both* the stuff in the > > events branch as it is now *and* Dan's proposal to bind class methods > > automatically. > > Right! It is exactly where the magic bites.
Heh, maybe your right. I think, as a JS programmer, that having to bind functions manually is what you expect to do but as a beginner it isn't but I suppose there's no point in confusing matters for experienced JS programmers. In the example here (where this is normally the element but if you pass in the a Class instance its bound to the object) I quite like how it works actually but each to their own. I still think it would be nicer if Class.create() actually created something that acted like a class from a class based language rather than just being a normal contructor. On that point about base: base.js doesn't bind methods but it does wrap every method to allow access to its super classes version of the method which is going to introduce even more of a performance overhead but hasn't been a problem in my experience. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
