Ryan Gahl states it best:

Then this opens up the whole can of worms of, well if we're adding
explicit
support for this non-iterable property, why not others, and the list
could
grow along with any resulting code.

To keep it simple at the core level there may not be a need to address
the issue when it is easily worked around.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to