Well, I'm using this one:
Object.extend(String.prototype, {
parseInt: parseInt.methodize(),
parseFloat: parseFloat.methodize(),
});
I thought this could be useful for someone else.
>
> I have been using methods for parseInt for a while. You simply call
> 'string'.to_i();
>
> // by encapsulating this code in an anonymous function, we can avoid
> intrusion upon the global namespace
> (function() {
> var _ruby_methods = {
> to_i: function() { // helper function for parseInt
> return parseInt(_string, 10);
> }
> };
>
> Object.extend(String.prototype, _ruby_methods);
> Object.extend(Number.prototype, _ruby_methods);
> })();
>
> On Jan 28, 2:37�pm, "artemy tregoubenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> What do you think about making parseInt & parseFloat string methods too?
>>
>> --
>> arty (http://arty.name)
> >
--
arty ( http://arty.name )
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
