On 14/02/2008, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/02/2008, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> > Thanks for the thumbs up.
> > deprecation.js is meant to be used with prototype.js, not a subset of
> > it, so I don't think that's really an issue for now.
> > The plan is to keep this new prototype extension up to date with the
> > changes in Prototype, so once we remove the Position object, we'll add
> > it to deprecation.js.
> Aha. Ok. I see. I was getting ahead of the game by taking out
> Postition before its time.
> > On Feb 14, 11:02 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > If you comment out from prototype.js the deprecated functions/classes
> > > (I take out the whole Position class for example), then deprecation.js
> > > fails due to the lack of the namespace: Position.
> > >
> > > So, using v188.8.131.52, should Position be defined but unused and
> > > therefore be in the global namespace or should it be commented out and
> > > deprecation.js cope with its absence?
> > >
> > > (I can't quite decide if this is a core or a spinoff issue).
Would it be possible to add a version number/build number to the
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at