I don't want to sound rude, but this is starting to look like a designed by committee bike shed. :/
I suggest people who are interested in the helping out with the docs (and that's really needed!) to either look at PDoc and help out completing it or propose (and implement) an alternative solution. Thanks! Tobie On Oct 26, 8:11 pm, Tom Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 26, 2008, at 2:37 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: > > > -1 for strikeout - simply looks ugly. > > > +1 for [deprecated] > > Agreed. Would it be too much information in the left menu to also add > the version the item was deprecated in? There are several old > versions still live in the wild. > > At the very least, the version number for deprecation (and removal) > should probably be added to the descriptive text in the right. Maybe > we should also consider added information on when something was added > (if after v1.5?). > > TAG --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
