On Nov 8, 6:14 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yaffle,
>
> (Just FWIW, I sense you're not a native English speaker, so I'll just
> mention that posting a message called "Prototype.js mistakes" will
> tend to be unnecessarily offensive to the folks you're trying to talk
> to.)
>
> On the script thing, by all means open a ticket on Lighthouse (details
> here[1]) and submit a patch; thank you in advance.
>
> On the eval thing: eval is a global function, not a property of the
> window object.[2] Some implementations (like Firefox and Opera) let
> you use window.eval and interpret the script in the context of the
> window object, which is great, but it's non-standard behavior not
> implemented by other browsers (IE and Safari, for instance).
Global eval is actually one of the most popular addition requests
(after people realize that `evalScripts` does not evaluate within
global scope :))
It's funny that after playing with comments stripping (as per author
suggestion) I realized that out `extractScripts` is not as robust as
it could be:
var s = '<script>(function(){ return "</script>" })();</script>';
s.extractScripts(); // '(function(){ return "'
and so `evalScripts` obviously fails when given a cut-off function
expression : )
>
> [1]http://www.prototypejs.org/contribute
> [2]http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> tj / crowder software / com
[...]
--
kangax
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
