One of the downsides of the current $super-based implementations is
that it's ridiculously complicated to pass the whole set of arguments
to the parent's method (the equivalent of calling super without
passing any arguments in ruby):
var Child = Class.create(Parent, {
doStuff: function($super) {
return $super.apply(null, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,
1)) + ' extra stuff';
}
});
The proposed implementation makes that dead easy and very
JavaScriptish:
var Child = Class.create(Parent, {
doStuff: function() {
return this.applySuper('doStuff', arguments) + ' extra stuff';
}
});
On the other hand, you'd have to handle this like so with your
proposed implementation:
var Child = Class.create(Parent, {
doStuff: function() {
return this.getSuper('doStuff').apply(this, arguments) + ' extra
stuff';
}
});
Which is a lot less elegant imho.
If speed is a concern, we could very well imagine storing a reference
to the superclass's prototype in the sublcass's prototype itself, so
that Class#applySuper could be changed to:
function applySuper(methodName, args) {
return this._super[methodName].apply(this, args);
}
Finally, adding a base class seems like a good idea.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
