On Sep 11, 8:06 am, Joran <jorangr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does that rule out String.toObject()?

For compatibility with 3rd party code, but more importantly with
future (standard and non-standard) and unknown implementations, it's
usually a good idea to leave built-in objects alone. Extending them is
only elegant in theory; in practice it's usually pretty ugly.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to