On Sep 11, 8:06 am, Joran <jorangr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does that rule out String.toObject()?

For compatibility with 3rd party code, but more importantly with
future (standard and non-standard) and unknown implementations, it's
usually a good idea to leave built-in objects alone. Extending them is
only elegant in theory; in practice it's usually pretty ugly.

--
kangax
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to