Forget the CPU cycles, it's the brain cycles I want back.

But it was all worth it to learn about JSLitmus. :-)

On Dec 17, 3:33 pm, Bob Kerns <> wrote:
> Not to be a curmudgeon about it -- I'll just point out that the CPU cycles
> consumed in processing the email for this discussion far exceeds the CPU
> cycles saved by all the code the lot of you will ever write with such
> tweaks.
> Purely entertainment / mental game play.
> If you want to improve performance, the mental effort would be better spent
> looking at your algorithm, or even better, measuring the performance to find
> where you need to focus your attention. I can tell you now it won't be your
> choice of iteration statements!
> Play on -- I just wanted to put it into context...

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to