Hi, What Alex posted wasn't a bug -- or at least, wasn't a bug in Prototype.
What's this other bug you're speaking of? Can you post an example? -- T.J. Crowder tj / crowder software / com On Nov 17, 9:07 am, bluezehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidentally, I believe there is a similar bug if you use the > onSuccess/onFailure callbacks - if you do, then the Ajax.Responder's > onSuccess/onFailure's don't fire > > On Nov 15, 9:40 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alex, > > > You're incrementing and decrementing Ajax.activeRequestCount, which is > > already being maintained by Prototype. Look again at the docs[1], it > > tells you that it's doing that. Hence your getting odd results. If > > you want to just use Ajax.activeRequestCount, you can do that; or if > > you want to duplicate its functionality, you can do that by using your > > own count variable, but you don't want to be modifying the one that's > > also being modified by Prototype. > > -- > > T.J. Crowder > > tj / crowder software / com > > > On Nov 14, 1:04 pm, "Alex Mcauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > sorry my original code was wrong .. > > > >http://pastie.org/314784 > > > > The code above actually says 2 requests when there should only be 1 !!! > > > > Here is a better example .... i cant recreate the problem entirely as it > > > needs a few periodical updaters to be going on in the background .... but > > > when they are and code like this is run then the request count goes up and > > > up and up when there is no request going on!! > > > > Regards > > > > Alex > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us" > > > <prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com> > > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:02 PM > > > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders > > > > Hi, > > > > > When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method > > > > onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from > > > > the Ajax.Responders counter .... > > > > Can you put together a small, self-contained test page demonstrating > > > the issue, post it to Pastie[1], and link to it from here? If another > > > set of eyes says it's a bug rather than (apologies) a > > > misunderstanding, we'll want to raise a ticket for it on Lighthouse. > > > > [1] http:/pastie.org > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > T.J. Crowder > > > tj / crowder software / com > > > > On Nov 14, 11:12 am, Jeztah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just to let everyone know i may have found a little bug in the > > > > Ajax.Responders .. or maybe it is mean to to this way > > > > > When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method > > > > onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from > > > > the Ajax.Responders counter .... > > > > > If you dont use onComplete in your options then it does ... > > > > > Strange behaviour it seems as i was wondering why something was > > > > keeping my Request count high on a page when it should be unloaded and > > > > removed from the pool > > > > > If its not a bug someone may have been scratching thier head for an > > > > hour like me trying to figure it out .. > > > > > In my case i was creating an activity display to show me when Ajax > > > > calls were being made on a page > > > > > Regards > > > > Alex > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
