Yeah, I just found the same thing after almost throwing my computer out of the window after trying to upgrade scripty to 1.8.2. The "update" breaks everything if you don't have the scripts in the head.
It's strange that it was changed from 1.8.1 to only look in the head. On Dec 11 2008, 1:21 am, Alejo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi George, > > Thank you very much for your answer. Yes, it did help me a bit! > - > The problem is that I don'tloadthose libraries directly, but using > the google.load() functionality. So my question was: where does > google.load() insert the scripts I call? > > Thanks a lot! > > On 10 dic, 14:53, George <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi There, > > > I use the google API loader, just above the closing body tag like > > this: > > > <scripttype="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/ > > libs/prototype/1.6.0.3/prototype.js"></script> > > <scripttype="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/ > > libs/scriptaculous/1.8.1/scriptaculous.js? > >load=effects,dragdrop,builder"></script> > > > The javascript declarations for theScriptaculousdependent files are > > inserted directly under the original call in 1.8.1. I also noticed > > that in 1.8.2 it only works if you have the declaration in the page > > head. > > > At the moment, I'm sticking with 1.8.1 but to be honest, there's no > > reason why I couldn't move the declarations to the head of the > > document. > > > Sorry that's not an answer, but hopefully it helps a bit. > > > George > > > On Dec 9, 9:06 am, Alejo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm sorry to re-open this thread, but no-one has told me anything > > > about it. > > > > Does anyone use Google Ajax Loader API with Prototype &Scriptaculous? > > > Have you got the same problem? How can I solve it? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > On 1 dic, 17:18, Alejo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I also have the same problem, but I use Google Ajax API Loader, so I > > > > don't know if the loader puts the javascript files in the head or > > > > somewhere else. How can I solve this problem?? > > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > > On 1 dic, 09:27, "joe.roback" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > So, why can't your scripts be in the head? Do you know you can add > > > > > > scripts to the head dynamically? Like this: > > > > > > for example, pixelpost photoblog, you want to onlyloadthese in the > > > > > image_template.html, and have a header.html+footer.html defined, the > > > > > scripts will have to go in the body. > > > > > > I also found issues with xhtml1.1 and the DOM. Had to use these > > > > > insteaad > > > > > > function createElement(element) { > > > > > if (typeof document.createElementNS != 'undefined') { > > > > > return > > > > > document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml', > > > > > element); > > > > > } > > > > > else if (typeof document.createElement != 'undefined') { > > > > > return document.createElement(element); > > > > > } > > > > > return false; > > > > > > } > > > > > > function setAttribute(element, name, value) { > > > > > if (typeof element.setAttributeNS != 'undefined') { > > > > > return > > > > > element.setAttributeNS('http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml', name, > > > > > value); > > > > > } > > > > > else if (typeof element.setAttribute != 'undefined') { > > > > > return element.setAttribute(name, value); > > > > > } > > > > > return false; > > > > > > } --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
