One additional comment ...
If I get clever and try to wait in a while loop for AjaxRequest to set
a flag that it has completed, the browser complains that some script
is attempting to make the browser to run slow, do you want to let it
So no, I can't create a slick wait loop like that either.
On Feb 26, 9:13 pm, BearState <wixelb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> OK, so Mr. Noob has made a lot of progress, but has found that when
> he makes an Ajax.Request(), the response is not set into the
> though small, is significant.
> Some knuckleheads might well be provoked to say, "Hey, I didn't get my
> data. There's a bug."
> There is no bug, but there is a pain in the ...
> this situation is folly because you can not proceed with the code in
> any semblance until AjaxRequest full completes returning the data.
> setTimeOut will only cause one code element to deley.
> How're the Prototype/Scriptaculous gurus handling this?
> BearState aka. Mr. Noob ( for the moment ).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at