Thanks a lot ~!!
On Mar 11, 9:16 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Frankly, again, you're not doing much to help us help you here. We
> can't magically see what you're doing and then tell you what's wrong
> with it.
>
> Ryan's right, of course, that the most efficient thing would be to
> process the entire list on the server. Of course, there are reasons
> not to do it that way too, such as keeping your user informed about
> what's happening, script processing timeouts on the server, etc.
>
> If you want to drive this from the client end, I'd probably recommend
> a chained loop, where each request's "success" handler triggers the
> next request. You could also update a progress indicator along the
> way. That way, you only have one outstanding request at a time.
> Based on what little you've said, I'm guessing you're ending up with
> dozens if not hundreds of outstanding overlappedrequests, and
> overflowing the capacity of some queue (in the browser, on the server,
> etc.) somewhere.
>
> Here's a quick-and-dirty example of a chained loop:
>
> function processList(list) {
> processListEntry($('display'), list, 0);
>
> }
>
> function processListEntry(display, list, index) {
> if (index >= list.length) {
> display.update('Done! Processed ' + list.length + '
> entries.');
> }
> else {
> display.update('Processing entry ' + (index + 1) + ' of ' +
> list.length + '...');
> newAjax.Request("server.php?email=" + list[index], {
> onSuccess: function() {
> processListEntry(display, list, index + 1);
> },
> onFailure: function() {
> display.update('Failed at entry ' + (index + 1) +
> '.');
> }
> });
> }
>
> }
>
> That example keeps all of its state information in various closures
> and parameter lists, which is l33t and c00l but may be a bit memory-
> intensive (at the very least, the GC will have to work pretty hard).
> But you can quickly write a class that stores all of the context as
> instance vars and avoid the closures.
>
> FWIW,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> tj / crowder software / com
> Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
>
> On Mar 11, 3:00 pm, Akshit Soota <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Okay so I replied once but replying the 2nd time to ask you a code
> > suggestion of Prototype JSAJAX. I have an array of emails and then
> > give me the code to send the emails via a specific PHP Page !
>
> > On Mar 11, 6:57 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Fails how? Which part is failing? What is the error? Are you
> > > overlapping therequests, or sending them serially? What have you
> > > already looked into? How have you tried to isolate the problem? Etc.
> > > etc. etc.
> > > --
> > > T.J. Crowder
> > > tj / crowder software / com
> > > Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
>
> > > On Mar 11, 1:03 pm, Akshit Soota <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm trying to sendmassnumber of emails via prototype JSAJAX. it
> > > > fails at a certain point for bulk mails. What do I do !! I call a PHP
> > > > Page !!
>
> > > > Regards,
> > > > akshits- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
