Thanks Colin, I did not know this point ! -- david
On 11 mar, 15:10, ColinFine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 11, 11:21 am, david <[email protected]> wrote: > > > btw, the initialisation of the Ajax.update is strange, it should be: > > new Ajax.Updater(container, url, {options}) > > > and for you the container parameter is {success: 'placeholder'} ?? > > > shouldn't it be: var myAjax = new Ajax.Updater( 'placeholder', url, > > {method:'get', onFailure: reportError, evalScripts: true}); > > That bit is all right (though a bit pointless): as an alternative to > an element, Ajax.Updater will accept an object with keys 'success' and > 'failure'. > > But I could not understand at all what Kevin was trying to do. > > Colin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
