Thanks Colin,
I did not know this point !

--
david

On 11 mar, 15:10, ColinFine <colin.f...@pace.com> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 11:21 am, david <david.brill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > btw, the initialisation of the Ajax.update is strange, it should be:
> > new Ajax.Updater(container, url, {options})
>
> > and for you the container parameter is {success: 'placeholder'} ??
>
> > shouldn't it be: var myAjax = new Ajax.Updater( 'placeholder', url,
> > {method:'get', onFailure: reportError, evalScripts: true});
>
> That bit is all right (though a bit pointless): as an alternative to
> an element, Ajax.Updater will accept an object with keys 'success' and
> 'failure'.
>
> But I could not understand at all what Kevin was trying to do.
>
> Colin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to