> Maybe a clarifying line in the docs would help here, > e.g. I'm with you; open a ticket on Lighthouse and assign it to me?
 https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/overview -- T.J. :-) On Jun 17, 8:33 am, steffenb <sbart...@tzi.de> wrote: > OK, I read those two points on Event#stop, but still believed > Event#stop would prevent any further event processing, as the method > name indicates. Maybe a clarifying line in the docs would help here, > e.g. > > Note: further observers on the same element will be called despite > Event#stop. > > Steffen > > On Jun 16, 3:38 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Interesting question. It's the expected behavior. The documentation > >  says that Event#stop will: > > > * Prevent further bubbling of the event > > * Prevent the default behavior of the event (where the browser allows > > it) > > > Not triggering other observers doesn't fall under either of those > > categories. It would also create a non-deterministic situation (since > > neither browsers nor Prototype guarantee the order in which event > > handlers are called). It would also be cross-talk (since your handler > > doesn't necessarily have anything to do with other handlers on the > > element), which is usually a bad idea, although I think a successful > > argument could be made that preventing bubbling also creates a cross- > > talk situation. :-) > > > http://prototypejs.org/api/event/stop > > > HTH, > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---