If you dont want to write your own may i suggest (proto fanboys dont scream
blasphomy at me !!)
Its very very lightweight and very configurable (relies on jQuery)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <c...@clicksports.de>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:25 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Need help for performantly creating tooltips
> Ah, now I understand your problem with this word. When I wrote this I
> didnt know that this isnt even a "real" world for native english
> speakers. In Germany it is just one of those "it-words" that people
> are using all the time. I just translated this word, assuming that my
> english version of it would exist :)
> Ok, to ask the question again (without using the word performant or
> If I have about 60 tooltips on page (that could load another subset of
> elements, that maybe have tooltips too), I would have about 120
> listeners (each tooltip needs at least a mouseover and one mouseout,
> right?). Is it the right way to just add two listeners (as in my
> example in my first post), which fire only on the elements I want?
> This would take the needed listeners from about 120 to only 2, which
> seems to be a really nice thing.
> But if I do it with only two listeners, every time something is
> hovered, it uses the findElement()-method to check for a tooltip. So
> what is faster and less memory consuming?
> Greetings from Germany,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at