On Aug 20, 9:39 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> > > > Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
> > > > <td/>
> > > > is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
>
> > > It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
>
> > Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
> > recently).
>
> If so, it's a misconception the W3C's own validator shares.
You're right. How bizarre. The spec clearly says no.
I'm sure I discovered this restriction because Firefox objected once,
but I can't think in what context.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
