Why not just use the afterFinish on the effect itself?  I don't see
the need for queuing here.

To fade and remove, I think this should do it (note I'm using fade,
not toggle):

        duration: 0.5,
        afterFinish: function(effect) {

T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available

On Aug 21, 11:40 am, tomkiller44 <thomas.gendul...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Scriptaculous through RoR and still be confused with the
> queue and Effect.Event.
> I want to fade out a row in a table before removing it from the DOM.
> I do this:
> Effect.toggle("invitation_row_1",'appear',{duration:0.5,
> queue:'remove'});
> new Effect.Event({queue: 'remove', afterFinish:function(){
>          Element.remove("invitation_row_1");
> }}
> The row is deleted without (or before) any fading effect.
> Has someone any idea why removal does not wait until effect
> completion?
> Cheers,
> Thomas
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to