This would be a really EXCELLENT use case for DOM Mutation events.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:09 AM, david <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Yaffle, > > There is nothing in the code that seems to automatically delete the > Storage object when an element is deleted. > Even in the Element .remove, > > I think that if it's closely linked to the element, DOM manipulation > on that element should be reflected on the storage, > btw, What does other think about Yaffle remarks ? > > Do you have fill a lighthouse ticket ? > > -- > david > > On 2 sep, 17:47, Yaffle <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... latest version > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
