> Is there any plans in the future to improve on prototype's speed?

Yes.  The core team are working on integrating the Sizzle selector
engine[1] (which is what the latest version of jQuery uses).  (This is
more of a challenge than it sounds; switching selector engines touches
a lot of things besides just the $$ and Element#select methods.)  I
*think* that's slated for the next release, but don't quote me.

[1] http://sizzlejs.com/

T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com

On Sep 21, 5:06 am, "Andy Daykin" <daykina...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been using prototype for a few months now, and so far I have enjoyed 
> the functionality that it brings.
> However, I have noticed that it's speed is lacking. This makes me tentative 
> to use prototype for a rather large project that I have been planning. To 
> confirm this, I ran the tests fromhttp://mootools.net/slickspeed/by checking 
> out the project from SVN, and used the latest versions of all of the 
> frameworks listed. Prototype and mootools consistently finished at the 
> bottom, which concerns me a little. After looking at the results I have been 
> seriously considering switching to JQuery, although I am disappointed at 
> their lack of OOP support.
> Is there any plans in the future to improve on prototype's speed?
> Also has there been a tentative release date set for scripty2? I'm reluctant 
> to develop anything that heavily uses scriptaculous, since it appears 
> scripty2 is in alpha state, although it has been that way since June.
> Thanks,
> -Andy
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to