I'm fully against marquee's in the first place but you also have an option to add the attribute data-duration to your element. If you're making a class to replace a depricated functionality you shouldn't use this way to add features or configuration to it.
I've also done it before (the client desperately wanted it -_-) and I used classnames 'slow', 'normal' and 'fast' to give my client the ability to modify it. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Eric Anderson <e...@pixelwareinc.com>wrote: > For those that miss 1998 when the <marquee> element was still valid I got a > quick script I put together yesterday which does similar functionality. It > moves the content using scrollLeft instead of CSS which I believe results in > smoother animation on less desirable browsers such as IE. > > http://gist.github.com/548690 > > The gist includes an example usage HTML document. Although marquee is a bad > thing in most situations there are a few valid use cases. So for people > looking for something like this it is free for all to use however they see > fit. > > Eric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. > To post to this group, send email to > prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<prototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.