I agree and would like to see Prototype start returning to the
forefront as the powerful JS library it is


On Mar 14, 10:53 am, Walter Lee Davis <wa...@wdstudio.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the rant, but I came to Prototype by way of early  
> exploration with Rails. I found Prototype approachable and learn-able  
> in a way that I didn't (and don't) find jQuery to be.
>
> I've invested years in learning Prototype and it has trained and  
> patterned my JavaScript brain. I'm quite cheesed about the notion of  
> having to learn another way to look at JavaScript.
>
> At the same time, I can't help but notice the <crickets> around here  
> lately. When I joined this list (back in the rails-spinoff days) there  
> were dozens of posts per day, now we're lucky to get there in a week.
>
> What the heck is going on here?
>
> Walter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to