Sure, that makes sense to me. It'll be a scramble to put everything back together again in an afternoon/evening, but I bet we could do it.
Let's prioritize these and figure out what we should do right away at the next meeting, and do a timeline to see what we must/should/might want to do by then. We can also seriously discuss active roll control then, although Dan can't make it to Tuesday evening meetings for a while... Andrew Dave Camarillo wrote: > For a complete 2nd airframe, there are a bunch of parts to be made, > including the following: > > -nosecond tip > -tip ring > -nosecone > -NSR > -Motor Coupler > -main and drouge chutes, with bags > -drouge pusher > -more aeroshell > -motor centering ring > -motor ferring > -replacement launch lug(s) for melted one(s) > -Avionics stuff, maybe same, maybe different > -Fins > > While I think we should continue to build these parts, I think there's > many many hours of work involved in making these, and if we want to do > a 2nd launch we should try to re-use what parts we can from the first > airframe. > > Perhaps we consider making 2nd's of the critical parts, and have a > replacement payload or avionics module that facilitates the canards? > In theory this airframe is reusable right? So we replace/rebuild the > consumable parts after the 1st launch, and launch again. It seams > reasonable that we could launch early saturday, re-assemble saturday > afternoon/evening, and re-launch Sunday. > > Thoughts? > > later, > -dave -- ------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Greenberg Portland State Aerospace Society (http://psas.pdx.edu/) [email protected] P: 503.788.1343 C: 503.708.7711 ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ psas-airframe mailing list [email protected] http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe
