In message <> you wrote:
> ...has lots of nice features like data identified packets
> instead of node addresses, etc.

It seemed to me like this particular feature was a pain when
we tried this before?  I thought we ended up kludging a node
addressing scheme that borrowed bits that may or may not
have belonged to us in order to get enough node addresses,
and then had trouble getting things to work.  Of course,
it's likely I'm mistaken.

At any rate, what's wrong with node addresses?  Software boy
here really likes sending data to specific nodes, and is
missing why he should fail to like it.


psas-avionics mailing list

Reply via email to