On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14:21PM -0800, Nathan Bergey wrote:
> 100,000 feet is a pretty number. Maybe
> when I get the Trajectory Optimizer working we can do an optimal mass
> problem with it and see just how big it would have to be. Maybe with dart?
> Anyway I wasn't suggesting we go for it just wanted to know what people
> thought about it so I don't sound stupid tomorrow on the air.

Now you're giving me a crazy idea.  Once we have working control, how
closely could we put the apogee to 100k feet, plus or minus?  Or any
arbitrary number roughly in the proper range for the engine size?

- Josh Triplett

_______________________________________________
psas-team mailing list
psas-team@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-team

This list's membership is automatically generated from the memberships of the 
psas-airframe, psas-avionics, and psas-general mail lists. Visit 
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu to individually subscribe/unsubscribe yourself from 
these lists.

Reply via email to