John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:45:04PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Oh, yes, this is definitely required. Don't modify the set of
> transformations while a procedure is ongoing--it will not work
> properly, as Jason as seen.
>
> Would it not be a good idea to put an assert() in
> {add,cancel}_transformation to enforce this?
Yes--I'll do that.
--
"Unix... is not so much a product
as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history
of the hacker subculture."
--Neal Stephenson
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
